Comments on: 04.03 – Excel Names http://www.fast-standard.org Promoting standardisation in financial modeling. Good models should be Flexible, Accurate, Structured and Transparent. Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:52:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Valentina http://www.fast-standard.org/the-standard/04-00-microsoft-excel-specifics/04-03-excel-names/comment-page-1/#comment-483 Valentina Thu, 17 Jun 2010 12:38:04 +0000 http://www.fast-standard.org/?page_id=449#comment-483 Kenny - Thanks for the link. I posted a comment on the Financial Mechanics blog, with some points about the research article. Kenny – Thanks for the link. I posted a comment on the Financial Mechanics blog, with some points about the research article.

]]> By: Kenny Whitelaw-Jones http://www.fast-standard.org/the-standard/04-00-microsoft-excel-specifics/04-03-excel-names/comment-page-1/#comment-421 Kenny Whitelaw-Jones Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:33:47 +0000 http://www.fast-standard.org/?page_id=449#comment-421 Valentina - thank you for your excellent question and I'm glad you share our enthusiasm for standardisation in financial modelling. My colleague John recently wrote a piece entitled <a href="http://financialmechanics.tv/blog/8-are-excel-names-a-good-idea/" rel="nofollow">are excel names a good idea?</a> on the Financial Mechanics blog - and there was some good follow on debate. Would be interested in your thoughts. Valentina – thank you for your excellent question and I’m glad you share our enthusiasm for standardisation in financial modelling.

My colleague John recently wrote a piece entitled are excel names a good idea? on the Financial Mechanics blog – and there was some good follow on debate.

Would be interested in your thoughts.

]]> By: Valentina http://www.fast-standard.org/the-standard/04-00-microsoft-excel-specifics/04-03-excel-names/comment-page-1/#comment-387 Valentina Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:39:51 +0000 http://www.fast-standard.org/?page_id=449#comment-387 Excellent website! It's great that excel modelling will become more standardised. The only thing question I have is what is the reasoning behind advocating Names, how about dynamic named ranges and also names for tables. I'm really interested in why this is so (because most books and websites advocate the use of Names). Excellent website! It’s great that excel modelling will become more standardised.

The only thing question I have is what is the reasoning behind advocating Names, how about dynamic named ranges and also names for tables. I’m really interested in why this is so (because most books and websites advocate the use of Names).

]]>